An Unacceptable Situation

Thank you to my friend and fellow blogger James for allowing us to feature his commentary here. This was originally posted at his own blog, Observations.

Our government still has not figured out what to do about the dependence on foreign oil that everybody agrees is an unacceptable situation.

The sensible thing to do, of course, is to produce more oil and natural gas from sources within the United States and off the coasts, and the sooner, the better. "Drill here, drill now" is not just a slogan; it's a prescription for energy independence.

The 30-year old ban on offshore drilling along the Atlantic and Pacific coasts expired a year ago, and yet the federal government has sat on its hands, allowing time to pass without moving to reduce the need to buy oil from countries that are unfriendly to us by opening up these areas for exploration.

Instead, our elected representatives have busied themselves with other things, including an unrealistic focus on immature "green" and alternative energy sources, while accessible oil and natural gas supplies lie undisturbed within our reach.

Both the House of Representatives and the Senate each have bills that would not just delay sensible development and progress, but punish the American people needlessly. The House put forth the Waxman-Markey bill last summer which passed by a thin seven votes, and just this week the Kerry-Boxer bill was brought forth. Both are cap-and-trade measures that will cause enormous problems.

American Petroleum Institute President Jack Gerard issued the following statement on the Kerry-Boxer climate bill: "Unfortunately, the Kerry-Boxer legislation is beginning to look a lot like the House's Waxman-Markey bill and a loser for American consumers. We can do better. If the Kerry-Boxer approach mimics the House bill, as early indications suggest, it will undermine our energy security by making American consumers more reliant on foreign sources of refined products, kill jobs and increase fuel costs."

While the leadership in Washington plays politics and ideological football with energy policy, the people they work for languish. Either of these bills will place significant pressure on the existing job levels in the oil and natural gas industry, which supports nearly 10 million jobs today, will also push the costs of fuel higher, and will increase, not reduce, our dependence on foreign oil.

Conversely, increasing domestic oil and natural gas production will create jobs and keep prices low, and has the added advantage of having no detectable effect on global climate change/global warming/global cooling.

Comments

Related

Blog Posts

‘Poisoned’ Politics, the Keystone XL and the Nation...

New York Times op-ed columnist Joe Nocera’s piece on the “poisoned” politics of the Keystone XL pipeline decision is a must read. Be...

Blog Posts

Energy Works in Minnesota

For the state of Minnesota, the oil and natural gas industry currently means: More than 117,000 jobs – with an average salary o...

Blog Posts

Energy Works in Colorado

Here’s what the oil and natural gas industry currently means to the state of Colorado: $20.5 billion contributed to the economy...

Blog Posts

Blogger Conference Call – SOTU Follow Up

Last week, API hosted a blogger conference call to follow up on President Obama’s State of the Union remarks. API Senior Tax Policy...

Blog Posts

What Energy Progress Looks Like

Interesting piece by the Washington Post’s Robert Samuelson, analyzing America’s energy future in light of new government figures sh...

Blog Posts

Energy and the State of the Union

There were lots of energy mentions in the president’s State of the Union speech, and we appreciate every one of them because they li...

Blog Posts

Graphically Speaking: Producing Oil Offshore

Yesterday, we looked at the time it takes to produce oil on federal lands, now let’s look at offshore.  As you can see from the char...

Blog Posts

Graphically Speaking: Future Global Energy Demand

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the world’s demand for energy is going to increase by nearly 50 perce...

Blog Posts

The Keystone XL, Cynicism and A Public Engaged

Hours after President Obama rejected the job-creating, energy-delivering Keystone XL pipeline, “The Fix” blogger Chris Cillizza, a l...

Blog Posts

Keystone and Consequences

Heather Zichal, Deputy Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change, writes: "But what’s abundantly clear is that t...

Blog Posts

An Illogical Decision, Not An Arbitrary Deadline

In announcing his rejection of the Keystone XL permit, President Obama said: "This announcement is not a judgment on the merits...

Blog Posts

‘Mr. President, What Are You Thinking?’

As the above relates to President Obama’s decision to reject the Keystone XL pipeline, the answer is clear: politics. Even though...

Blog Posts

Rejecting the National Interest

I just read the best argument for the Keystone XL pipeline this morning: “… the addition of crude oil pipeline capacity between...

Blog Posts

The Keystone XL’s Real Jobs Numbers

In an economy with more than 13 million Americans out of work, every potential new job matters, right? Wrong, according to some Keys...

Blog Posts

What Would You Do?

Compelling video from the office of U.S. House Speaker John Boehner that cuts to the heart of the case for approving the Keystone XL...

Stay Connected