An Unacceptable Situation

Thank you to my friend and fellow blogger James for allowing us to feature his commentary here. This was originally posted at his own blog, Observations.

Our government still has not figured out what to do about the dependence on foreign oil that everybody agrees is an unacceptable situation.

The sensible thing to do, of course, is to produce more oil and natural gas from sources within the United States and off the coasts, and the sooner, the better. "Drill here, drill now" is not just a slogan; it's a prescription for energy independence.

The 30-year old ban on offshore drilling along the Atlantic and Pacific coasts expired a year ago, and yet the federal government has sat on its hands, allowing time to pass without moving to reduce the need to buy oil from countries that are unfriendly to us by opening up these areas for exploration.

Instead, our elected representatives have busied themselves with other things, including an unrealistic focus on immature "green" and alternative energy sources, while accessible oil and natural gas supplies lie undisturbed within our reach.

Both the House of Representatives and the Senate each have bills that would not just delay sensible development and progress, but punish the American people needlessly. The House put forth the Waxman-Markey bill last summer which passed by a thin seven votes, and just this week the Kerry-Boxer bill was brought forth. Both are cap-and-trade measures that will cause enormous problems.

American Petroleum Institute President Jack Gerard issued the following statement on the Kerry-Boxer climate bill: "Unfortunately, the Kerry-Boxer legislation is beginning to look a lot like the House's Waxman-Markey bill and a loser for American consumers. We can do better. If the Kerry-Boxer approach mimics the House bill, as early indications suggest, it will undermine our energy security by making American consumers more reliant on foreign sources of refined products, kill jobs and increase fuel costs."

While the leadership in Washington plays politics and ideological football with energy policy, the people they work for languish. Either of these bills will place significant pressure on the existing job levels in the oil and natural gas industry, which supports nearly 10 million jobs today, will also push the costs of fuel higher, and will increase, not reduce, our dependence on foreign oil.

Conversely, increasing domestic oil and natural gas production will create jobs and keep prices low, and has the added advantage of having no detectable effect on global climate change/global warming/global cooling.

Comments

Related

Blog Posts

In an Election Year, Time to Talk Energy

Just a thought, but how great would it be if one of this fall’s presidential debates focused solely on energy issues? Past presid...

Blog Posts

Unused Leases? You’ve Got to be Joking!

The warmed-over claim that oil and natural gas companies aren’t using large numbers of leases on public lands is like a Mark Twain...

Blog Posts

Watch Live: Energy in an Election Year

.blog #main .post-body .video-wrapper { width:500px; height:418px; padding:0; overflow:visible; margin:0 auto 18px; } ....

Blog Posts

Hansen’s Oil Sands Facts are Lost in Space

To hear it from environmental activist James Hansen, development of the oil sands in Canada will usher in the apocalypse, “game ove...

Blog Posts

Job Creation To-Do List? Here’s Ours

Here’s the president talking about job creation Tuesday in Albany, N.Y.: “Now, we know the true engine of job creation in this...

Blog Posts

To the President’s Ear: Build the Keystone XL

In an interview with Fox Business Channel this week, billionaire Warren Buffett voiced support for construction of the Keystone XL...

Blog Posts

The Demand for Energy and Steel

There’s a good story going on in Lorain, Ohio, a steel town that has seen ups and downs. Thanks to the surge in production of energ...

Blog Posts

Facts, Not Excuses, Should Guide Decision on Re-Routed...

It’s good to hear that TransCanada has submitted its new application for a presidential permit to build the Keystone XL pipeline. T...

Blog Posts

All For Efficiency

A recent post on the White House Blog updates the administration’s effort to see federal agencies make at least $2 billion in energ...

Blog Posts

Washington Post: Keystone XL Rejection Has ‘Little Ra...

More on the Keystone XL pipeline. The Washington Post editorializes: “President Obama’s refusal so far to authorize Keystone X...

Blog Posts

Ohio Summit: Talking Energy, Jobs

Editor’s note, 5/3: The event has concluded; see below for the archived videos. There’s not a better venue for a high-level discu...

Blog Posts

Keystone XL: Put Workers to Work, Mr. President

Key points made by the president during Monday’s speech at a conference of the AFL-CIO’s Building and Construction Trades Departmen...

Blog Posts

Hey, Jay Carney, You Forgot Something!

POLITICO Pro Energy reports that while talking to reporters about crucifixion comments by EPA’s Region 6 administrator, White House...

Blog Posts

‘If I Wanted America to Fail …’

Here’s an abbreviated version of a video by Free Market America on administration policies that the group says are undermining dome...

Blog Posts

EPA Regulation and Crucifixion

Fox News reports that EPA’s Region 6 administrator has apologized for comparing his agency’s enforcement strategy to Roman crucifix...

Stay Connected