As the Senate Finance Committee continues its series of hearings on climate change, it is encouraging that senators are considering issues related to the distribution of free allowances under a cap-and-trade system.
Senators should understand that copying the ill-conceived House approach will not contribute to a comprehensive energy policy that creates jobs, grows the economy and addresses climate change. The House approach places a disproportionate burden on all consumers of gasoline, diesel fuel, heating oil, jet fuel, propane and other petroleum products.
The House approach relies on a flawed distribution of free allowances that picks winners and losers as the nation transitions to low-carbon sources. The House plan would hold refiners responsible for 44 percent of emissions but only al... more »













© Copyright 2012 API. All Rights Reserved. To learn more about API,
Comments