Cap Removal Delayed

High seas have forced BP to postpone efforts to remove the containment cap on the Macondo well. The company says engineers are standing by, waiting to remove the cap and the battered blowout preventer (BOP) before replacing the BOP with one from the Deepwater Driller II. No oil is expected to be spilled during the operation.

In related news today:

  • Bloomberg reports that BP engineers misread pressure data on the Macondo well before the explosion and fire. Their positive interpretation of the data led to the decision to replace the heavy drilling fluids with lighter seawater, which could not prevent natural gas from rising from the well leading to the explosion and fire.
  • Platts reports that two more sessions of hearings are likely to be held before the national commission investigating the spill releases its report in January.
  • The Bipartisan Policy Center released a memo last week detailing its findings on the efficacy of the offshore moratorium in protecting safety and mitigating future harm. The memo called for a balanced approach to domestic oil production that weighs "the benefits of reducing our reliance on imported oil, against the economic and environmental risks of producing it." It also stressed that the Department of the Interior should "not take an undue amount of time" to resume offshore drilling.
  • Documents have surfaced showing that the administration knew the deepwater moratorium would destroy nearly 23,000 jobs.

API's Andy Radford addressed the moratorium at a Poynter Institute gathering in New Orleans last week. He explained that the nation will feel the moratorium's effects in the future when U.S. oil and natural gas production is likely to decline.

As Andy pointed out, the world is expected to need 44 percent more energy in 2030 than it consumed in 2006. Restrictions that slow domestic production run counter to the nation's long-term desire to reduce dependence on other countries for energy.

Comments

Related

Blog Posts

‘Poisoned’ Politics, the Keystone XL and the Nation...

New York Times op-ed columnist Joe Nocera’s piece on the “poisoned” politics of the Keystone XL pipeline decision is a must read. Be...

Blog Posts

Energy Works in Minnesota

For the state of Minnesota, the oil and natural gas industry currently means: More than 117,000 jobs – with an average salary o...

Blog Posts

Energy Works in Colorado

Here’s what the oil and natural gas industry currently means to the state of Colorado: $20.5 billion contributed to the economy...

Blog Posts

Political Theater on Refined Exports

One of the flimsier arguments deployed against the Keystone XL pipeline is that the Canadian oil sands crude it would deliver to U.S...

Blog Posts

More Evidence of the Keystone XL Consensus

New polling on the Keystone XL pipeline shows consensus in America isn’t always elusive. The United Technologies/National Journal Co...

Blog Posts

Energy Works in Florida

Here’s what the oil and natural gas industry currently means to the state of Florida: More than $18 billion contributed to the...

Blog Posts

What Energy Progress Looks Like

Interesting piece by the Washington Post’s Robert Samuelson, analyzing America’s energy future in light of new government figures sh...

Blog Posts

Energy and the State of the Union

There were lots of energy mentions in the president’s State of the Union speech, and we appreciate every one of them because they li...

Blog Posts

The Keystone XL Majority

New polling from Rasmussen Reports on the Keystone XL pipeline: “Most voters still favor building the Keystone XL pipeline from...

Blog Posts

Graphically Speaking: Future Global Energy Demand

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the world’s demand for energy is going to increase by nearly 50 perce...

Blog Posts

The Keystone XL, Cynicism and A Public Engaged

Hours after President Obama rejected the job-creating, energy-delivering Keystone XL pipeline, “The Fix” blogger Chris Cillizza, a l...

Blog Posts

Politics, Energy, and the President

As befitting a day when, for the president, political interest trumped the national interest, he opened his 2012 campaign advertisin...

Blog Posts

‘Mr. President, What Are You Thinking?’

As the above relates to President Obama’s decision to reject the Keystone XL pipeline, the answer is clear: politics. Even though...

Blog Posts

Rejecting the National Interest

I just read the best argument for the Keystone XL pipeline this morning: “… the addition of crude oil pipeline capacity between...

Blog Posts

The Keystone XL’s Real Jobs Numbers

In an economy with more than 13 million Americans out of work, every potential new job matters, right? Wrong, according to some Keys...

Blog Posts

What Would You Do?

Compelling video from the office of U.S. House Speaker John Boehner that cuts to the heart of the case for approving the Keystone XL...

Blog Posts

The White House’s Natural Gas/Manufacturing Connectio...

From where we sit, a new White House report that gives substantial credit to natural gas production for recent growth in U.S. manufa...

Blog Posts

About Those Net Exports…

News that the United States was a net exporter of finished petroleum products last year prompts logical questions – and some wronghe...

Stay Connected