Chevron: Offshore Energy is a Win for America

It's time to add some common sense to the debate over offshore energy development. The benefits are obvious: More domestic energy, more jobs, a much needed boost to the economy without depending on government spending, improved U.S. energy security, and fewer U.S. dollars being sent overseas to purchase oil from other countries. At a time when the unemployment rate continues to hover just below 10 percent and American families are worried about their futures, now is the time to open more areas to energy development.

But don't take it from me. Instead, consider the wise words of Gary P. Luquette, President of Chevron North America Exploration and Production Co. In a blog post at the Huffington Post, Gary disagrees with President Obama who said recently that this country must make "tough" decisions about offshore development:

"When it comes to respectfully developing America's abundant oil and natural gas resources--including areas in the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS)--there's nothing tough about this decision. We should be developing America's Outer Continental Shelf, and we should be doing it now. It's a huge win for America."

Gary explains that offshore development could provide more than one million barrels of oil or oil equivalent each day to the U.S. economy, accounting for about one-fifth of today's domestic energy production. He adds that exploration and production need not threaten the environment:

"The same capability that allows us to operate in the Gulf's extremes--in over 10,000 feet of water, for example--also safeguards our people and the environment. Advances in technology provide tremendous benefit, but that's reinforced by how we operate. Even if a soft drink can accidentally fell overboard, we'd report it. We know that our ability to operate in the rest of the OCS depends on doing things in a responsible and sustainable way. We take this responsibility very seriously."

The full text of Gary's blog post can be found here. A few months ago, Gary also participated in an EnergyTomorrow Radio podcast.

Comments

Related

Blog Posts

Forestalling a ‘Regulatory Avalanche’

John Felmy, API’s chief economist, talked to reporters this week about a looming federal “regulatory avalanche” that could impact th...

Blog Posts

‘Poisoned’ Politics, the Keystone XL and the Nation...

New York Times op-ed columnist Joe Nocera’s piece on the “poisoned” politics of the Keystone XL pipeline decision is a must read. Be...

Blog Posts

Survey Says, Misinformation on Energy, Keystone XL

Politico reports (subscription required) this week on a new poll that shows a political edge for the president on energy and jobs –...

Blog Posts

Energy Works in Minnesota

For the state of Minnesota, the oil and natural gas industry currently means: More than 117,000 jobs – with an average salary o...

Blog Posts

Energy Works in Colorado

Here’s what the oil and natural gas industry currently means to the state of Colorado: $20.5 billion contributed to the economy...

Blog Posts

Blogger Conference Call – SOTU Follow Up

Last week, API hosted a blogger conference call to follow up on President Obama’s State of the Union remarks. API Senior Tax Policy...

Blog Posts

Political Theater on Refined Exports

One of the flimsier arguments deployed against the Keystone XL pipeline is that the Canadian oil sands crude it would deliver to U.S...

Blog Posts

Hydraulic Fracturing Workshops Launched

This week API is launching a series of hydraulic fracturing workshops in shale energy states to continue the conversation on industr...

Blog Posts

More Evidence of the Keystone XL Consensus

New polling on the Keystone XL pipeline shows consensus in America isn’t always elusive. The United Technologies/National Journal Co...

Stay Connected