Congress vs. EPA: A Contest Worth Watching

Pressure is mounting against the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) bid to regulate greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) under the Clean Air Act. And with so many members of Congress involved, a scorecard is needed to keep track of the action.

Yesterday, Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) introduced legislation to suspend EPA's proposed GHG stationary-source regulations for two years. In a statement, Sen. Rockefeller said:

"Congress, not the EPA, must be the ideal decision-maker on such a challenging issue...We must set this delay in stone and give Congress enough time to consider a comprehensive energy bill..."

Similar legislation was introduced in the House of Representatives by Reps. Nick Rahall (D-WV), Alan Mollohan (D-WV), and Rick Boucher (D-VA).

The United Mine Workers of America union voiced its support for Rockefeller's bill. In a letter, union President Cecil Roberts stated that the Clean Air Act was "not designed to address" climate change.

Likewise, the National Automobile Dealers Association and a large group of Ohio-based businesses and trade associations penned separate letters expressing their objections to EPA's proposed regulations. The Ohio letter, which was sent to Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), says allowing the EPA to regulate GHGs "would be inflexible and cost prohibitive, thereby hurting Ohio businesses, workers and families."

This flurry of activity prompted Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) to issue a statement pointing out the bipartisan "resistance to EPA's back-door climate regulations." Murkowski introduced a resolution of disapproval in the Senate several days ago to prevent EPA from moving forward on GHG regulations.

This week Reps. Ike Skelton (D-MO), Collin Peterson (D-MN) and Jo Ann Emerson (R-MO) introduced an identical resolution in the House, while Reps. John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Joe Barton (R-TX) introduced a similar resolution calling the proposed regulations a "back door national energy tax."

There are scores of members of the Senate and the House--Democrats and Republicans--who have gone on the record against EPA's current path toward GHG regulations. At last count, the various measures have a total 330 sponsors and cosponsors.

Comments

Related

Blog Posts

Shale Energy in Ohio = Jobs, Economic Hope

More evidence that shale energy in Ohio is looming as an economic dynamo. First, an op-ed from the Coshocton Tribune discusses wa...

Blog Posts

Made in America: Common-Sense Energy Regulatory Structu...

We talked recently about increasing access to domestic oil and natural gas as key to a made-in-America energy plan. Here’s another...

Blog Posts

Still Waiting for Cellulosic Biofuels – EPA Continues...

To pretty much no one’s surprise, EPA announced Friday that it is denying a petition that it reconsider its 2011 advanced cellulosi...

Blog Posts

On Disclosure Rule, SEC Should Heed White House

Common sense should be applied to a federal transparency proposal – the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s pending Section 1...

Blog Posts

Higher Supply = Higher Prices or NRDC Flunks Econ 101

Who could have imagined the day would come when the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) crafted a report focused on relieving...

Blog Posts

Massachusetts, Jobs and the Shale Energy Revolution

Interesting report in the Boston Globe about how a ripple of economic benefits from shale natural gas development is reaching a non...

Blog Posts

Apples, Oranges, and the Oil Sands

The Congressional Research Service (CRS) added to the pile of conflicting well-to-wheels analyses with its report released this wee...

Blog Posts

Keystone XL: Safety, Reliability and Jobs

TransCanada President and CEO Russ Girling has a letter to the editor in the New York Times after the newspaper’s recent editorial...

Blog Posts

Stop-Gap Energy vs. Stable Energy

Scroll down a bit in this wrap-up of last weekend’s G8 Summit from The Hill newspaper, and you’ll see that the president and other...

Blog Posts

Made in America: Increase Access for Secure Energy Futu...

American-made energy. With the Energy Information Administration projecting that the United States will need more than 16 percent a...

Blog Posts

Study: E15 Could Put Some Engines at Risk

More on the potential risk to America’s car and truck fleet posed by E15 – gasoline containing 15 percent ethanol that has EPA appr...

Blog Posts

Ethanol – Academics and Reality

Supporters of continuing ethanol subsidies are once again using a study out of Iowa State to bolster their case, and once again, it...

Stay Connected