Energy and National Security

How do you define the expression "energy security?" To many people, it means having a secure supply of energy to support the American way of life--ample gasoline for the car, heat for the home, and chemicals to make products used in households and hospitals throughout the United States.

For the U.S. military, energy security means having the ability to protect and defend the nation. To that end, the military maintains the integrity of fuel supply lines, seeks to improve energy efficiency, protects the electrical grid that powers military installations, and works toward increasing the use and availability of alternative fuels, including fuels derived from Canadian oil sands.

According to the U.S. Navy's Energy Program, the Department of Defense is the largest government and individual petroleum user in the United States, consuming about 330,000 barrels of oil a day. The U.S. Navy consumes about 100,000 barrels of oil per day, the Air Force uses about 200,000 barrels a day and the Army consumes about 30,000 barrels per day. This oil powers the nation's ships, jetfighters, humvees and tanks--and supplies the energy needs of our men and women in uniform.

The U.S. Navy is holding its 2009 Naval Energy Forum today and tomorrow. If you're interested in the relationship between energy security and national security, you can watch the conference online.

Comments

Related

Blog Posts

Energy and the State of the Union

There were lots of energy mentions in the president’s State of the Union speech, and we appreciate every one of them because they li...

Blog Posts

The Keystone XL, Cynicism and A Public Engaged

Hours after President Obama rejected the job-creating, energy-delivering Keystone XL pipeline, “The Fix” blogger Chris Cillizza, a l...

Blog Posts

An Illogical Decision, Not An Arbitrary Deadline

In announcing his rejection of the Keystone XL permit, President Obama said: "This announcement is not a judgment on the merits...

Blog Posts

‘Mr. President, What Are You Thinking?’

As the above relates to President Obama’s decision to reject the Keystone XL pipeline, the answer is clear: politics. Even though...

Blog Posts

Rejecting the National Interest

I just read the best argument for the Keystone XL pipeline this morning: “… the addition of crude oil pipeline capacity between...

Blog Posts

The Keystone XL’s Real Jobs Numbers

In an economy with more than 13 million Americans out of work, every potential new job matters, right? Wrong, according to some Keys...

Blog Posts

Taking Action and Engaging the Industry on Keystone XL

Editor’s note: Guest post from the good folks at Energy Nation. With less than 30 days until President Obama must decide whether o...

Blog Posts

Vote 4 Energy’s Metro Profile

Check out the slideshow below for a visual on the new “Vote 4 Energy” campaign – as currently seen in the Capitol South Metro statio...

Blog Posts

Starting the Energy Debate

Will Americans vote energy in 2012? We think they should, and API President and CEO Jack Gerard made a compelling argument for it ye...

Blog Posts

Vote 4 Energy: The Launch

Challenge: Getting more Americans to see themselves as energy-issue voters in 2012. Solution: API’s Vote 4 Energy campaign, launch...

Blog Posts

Photos and Context on Oil Sands

From a post on the Climate Progress website (cross-posted on Grist), on the environmental effects of Canadian oil sands production:...

Stay Connected