EPA Ozone Standards Based on Politics, Not Science

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today proposed to tighten U.S. ground-level ozone standards to protect people as well as plants. Under the new guidelines, the "primary" standard aimed at protecting public health would be reduced to 0.060 and 0.070 parts per million (ppm) measured over eight hours from the 0.075 ppm level set in March 2008.

API reacted swiftly in a statement:

"The action lacks scientific justification. EPA acknowledges the newer studies on ozone do not materially change any of the broad scientific conclusions regarding the health effects of exposure. Given that conclusion, there is absolutely no basis for EPA to propose changing the ozone standards promulgated by the EPA Administrator in 2008. To do so is an obvious politicization of the air quality standard setting process that could mean unnecessary energy cost increases, job losses and less domestic oil and natural gas development and energy security."

As explained on the National Association of Manufacturers' (NAM) blog, the map below was prepared a few years ago to show the counties that likely would be out of attainment with the new standards. To meet the new standards, NAM says, "Billions of dollars would be spent by local governments and the private sector, with marginal benefits."

nonattainmentmap.jpg

Hat tip to Carter Wood of Shopfloor.org

EPA will accept public comments on the new standards after the proposed rule is published in the Federal Register.

Comments

Related

Blog Posts

Fear Mongering on Exports

Kevin Hall, of McClatchy, writes: “U.S. demand for oil and refined products - including gasoline - is down sharply from last ye...

Blog Posts

More on Fair Public Disclosure

Earlier this month we posted on the way a well-intended measure to foster transparency in U.S. oil and natural gas companies’ dealin...

Blog Posts

The Folly of Anti-Trade Thinking

In his State of the Union message last month, President Obama staked out the administration’s position on trade, citing new deals wi...

Blog Posts

The President’s Energy Tax Hikes: Section 199 Deducti...

The president’s State of the Union address last month had lots of good stuff in it about domestic oil and natural gas production. Un...

Blog Posts

The President’s ‘Anti-Stimulus’

From the president’s remarks during Monday’s rollout of his 2013 budget: “The last thing we need is for Washington to stand in...

Blog Posts

National Poll: Keystone XL Support Nears 70 Percent

A new Fox News poll shows continued support for building the Keystone XL pipeline. The survey of 1,100 registered voters conducted F...

Blog Posts

‘Poisoned’ Politics, the Keystone XL and the Nation...

New York Times op-ed columnist Joe Nocera’s piece on the “poisoned” politics of the Keystone XL pipeline decision is a must read. Be...

Blog Posts

Energy Works in Minnesota

For the state of Minnesota, the oil and natural gas industry currently means: More than 117,000 jobs – with an average salary o...

Blog Posts

Energy Works in Colorado

Here’s what the oil and natural gas industry currently means to the state of Colorado: $20.5 billion contributed to the economy...

Blog Posts

Political Theater on Refined Exports

One of the flimsier arguments deployed against the Keystone XL pipeline is that the Canadian oil sands crude it would deliver to U.S...

Blog Posts

More Evidence of the Keystone XL Consensus

New polling on the Keystone XL pipeline shows consensus in America isn’t always elusive. The United Technologies/National Journal Co...

Blog Posts

Energy Works in Florida

Here’s what the oil and natural gas industry currently means to the state of Florida: More than $18 billion contributed to the...

Blog Posts

Energy and the State of the Union

There were lots of energy mentions in the president’s State of the Union speech, and we appreciate every one of them because they li...

Stay Connected