EPA Ozone Standards Based on Politics, Not Science

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today proposed to tighten U.S. ground-level ozone standards to protect people as well as plants. Under the new guidelines, the "primary" standard aimed at protecting public health would be reduced to 0.060 and 0.070 parts per million (ppm) measured over eight hours from the 0.075 ppm level set in March 2008.

API reacted swiftly in a statement:

"The action lacks scientific justification. EPA acknowledges the newer studies on ozone do not materially change any of the broad scientific conclusions regarding the health effects of exposure. Given that conclusion, there is absolutely no basis for EPA to propose changing the ozone standards promulgated by the EPA Administrator in 2008. To do so is an obvious politicization of the air quality standard setting process that could mean unnecessary energy cost increases, job losses and less domestic oil and natural gas development and energy security."

As explained on the National Association of Manufacturers' (NAM) blog, the map below was prepared a few years ago to show the counties that likely would be out of attainment with the new standards. To meet the new standards, NAM says, "Billions of dollars would be spent by local governments and the private sector, with marginal benefits."

nonattainmentmap.jpg

Hat tip to Carter Wood of Shopfloor.org

EPA will accept public comments on the new standards after the proposed rule is published in the Federal Register.

Comments

Related

Blog Posts

Ethanol – Academics and Reality

Supporters of continuing ethanol subsidies are once again using a study out of Iowa State to bolster their case, and once again, it...

Blog Posts

In an Election Year, Time to Talk Energy

Just a thought, but how great would it be if one of this fall’s presidential debates focused solely on energy issues? Past presid...

Blog Posts

Unused Leases? You’ve Got to be Joking!

The warmed-over claim that oil and natural gas companies aren’t using large numbers of leases on public lands is like a Mark Twain...

Blog Posts

Hansen’s Oil Sands Facts are Lost in Space

To hear it from environmental activist James Hansen, development of the oil sands in Canada will usher in the apocalypse, “game ove...

Blog Posts

Oil and Energy Security

The Congressional Budget Office has a new report out on energy security that’s sure to spark conversation.  Much of that will seem...

Blog Posts

Going Beyond Rhetoric on Natural Gas

Over on the White House Blog, there’s genuine enthusiasm for natural gas, and for good reason.  Natural gas is clean-burning, affor...

Blog Posts

Job Creation To-Do List? Here’s Ours

Here’s the president talking about job creation Tuesday in Albany, N.Y.: “Now, we know the true engine of job creation in this...

Blog Posts

To the President’s Ear: Build the Keystone XL

In an interview with Fox Business Channel this week, billionaire Warren Buffett voiced support for construction of the Keystone XL...

Blog Posts

The Demand for Energy and Steel

There’s a good story going on in Lorain, Ohio, a steel town that has seen ups and downs. Thanks to the surge in production of energ...

Blog Posts

The Post and the EPA’s Perception Problem

The Washington Post’s take on the EPA, in the wake of Al Armendariz, is scathing. The Post editorial: “The most reasonable int...

Blog Posts

Facts, Not Excuses, Should Guide Decision on Re-Routed...

It’s good to hear that TransCanada has submitted its new application for a presidential permit to build the Keystone XL pipeline. T...

Stay Connected