Keystone XL: ‘Put Thousands of Americans Back to Work’

Americans want the Keystone XL pipeline built. There’s no mistaking that in polling, including a new one we’ll get into down below.

Of all the Americans who’ve waited more than four years for the president to give the full Keystone XL the go-ahead, few have more on the line than thousands of building and construction workers. For them it’s bread on the table. Sean McGarvey, president of the AFL-CIO’s Building and Construction Trade Department, talked to reporters this week about his union’s support for the project's approval:

“For the skilled craft professionals that I am privileged to represent, the past four years have not been a recession, they have been a depression. Today, the unemployment rate in the U.S. construction industry is 16 percent.”

API President and CEO Jack Gerard also was on the call and reiterated some of the compelling reasons for the president to approve Keystone XL:

  • Creation of well-paying middle class jobs – The full project would generate 20,000 U.S. jobs, according to builder TransCanada, and could support 117,000 new American jobs associated with oil sands development by 2035 (Canadian Energy Research Institute).
  • Energy security – The pipeline would be able to move more than 800,000 barrels of oil per day from a secure and friendly source, Canada. Also, the Keystone XL would pick up 25 percent of its capacity from the U.S. Bakken shale region, strengthening our internal energy infrastructure.
  • Economics – The United States would solidify its trading relationship with Canada in which 90 cents of every dollar spent on Canada’s oil is returned to the U.S. in the form of American goods and services bought by Canadians.

Gerard:

The Keystone XL is “a project that will not only create good middle-class jobs for thousands of the safest, most highly trained workers in the building trades, but will expand access to secure supplies of Canadian crude oil that will be processed in state-of-the-art refineries here in the U.S. It would be an investment in America’s economy and in its energy future.”

Back to public opinion. This project, which has cleared three different environmental reviews by the State Department, is supported by 69 percent in a new Harris Interactive survey of registered voters:

The result is consistent with the strong support registered in a number of national surveys (Rasmussen, Fox News and Pew Research). According to Harris, majorities back the full Keystone XL according to:

  • Age: 65 percent in the 18-34 and 35-54 age groups; 74 percent in the 55-and-over age group.
  • Gender: Men 71 percent; women 67 percent.
  • Political affiliation: Republicans 76 percent; Democrats 67 percent; Independents 70 percent.

Harris also found that 82 percent believe U.S. policy should support the use of oil from Canada, and 83 percent think the Keystone XL would strengthen America’s energy security. Overall, that’s a very strong message – a mandate for action. While a minority (11 percent) strongly opposes the pipeline – and Canadian oil for that matter – the president should listen to the overwhelming majority that considers the Keystone XL a “complete no-brainer,” as Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper has called it.

McGarvey said his members are watching. He said he expects the president to do the “right thing” – the thing that’s good for U.S. jobs, good for America:

“There is no reason for any further delay. In fact, there is every reason in the world to approve this project. The Keystone pipeline is critical to our domestic energy industry. And our domestic energy is proving to be critical to the re-awakening of the American economy. This has been the most scrutinized infrastructure project, perhaps, in our nation's history. And at every juncture, concerns about safety and the environment have been met and satisfied. It is now time to build the Keystone XL pipeline and put thousands of Americans back to work.”

Yes, it’s time.

Comments

Related

Blog Posts

Energy Today – June 18, 2013

Chicago Tribune – Illinois Governor Signs Bill to Regulate Fracking Illinois is one step closer to  hydraulic fracturing after bi...

Blog Posts

Embracing the Promise of Oil and Natural Gas

Great question during the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s annual energy conference this week – paraphrasing: Given the tec...

Blog Posts

Shale Energy Development = Opportunity for Pennsylvania...

The energy stimulus from shale development last year in Pennsylvania is big – big as in approaching a number with nine zeroes:...

Blog Posts

Energy Today – June 14, 2013

Fuel Fix Blog – Report: Renewables, Natural Gas Should Work Together On the Grid According to a new report by the Texas Clean Ene...

Blog Posts

U.S. Oil Growth, Energy Security and Global Impact

The bottom-line numbers in BP’s 2012 Statistical Review depict surging U.S. domestic oil and natural gas production, mainly because...

Blog Posts

Energy Today – June 12, 2013

Fuel Fix Blog – U.S. Led World in Oil Growth in 2012 According to a new BP report, U.S. oil production growth,  the largest in th...

Blog Posts

Yes, Virginia (and 49 other states) Oil and Natural Gas...

BusinessInsider.com has an article disparaging oil and natural gas sector employment, as well as the industry’s ability to create n...

Blog Posts

Farmers for Fracking in New York

A great headline this week in the New York Daily News – “Please, frack beneath my farm” – tops a great guest piece by upstate organ...

Blog Posts

Energy Today – June 11, 2013

Pittsburgh Business Times – Marcellus Royalties Rising The newspaper reports on a study by the Allegheny Institute for Public Pol...

Stay Connected