Message Muddle on Energy Tax Hike

OK, which is it? First, Democrats said raising taxes on the oil and natural gas industry would do something about rising gasoline prices. Then they said it wouldn't. On Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said both, almost in the same breath.

Talking on the Senate floor about a vote on a proposal to end standard business tax deductions just for the largest oil and natural gas companies, Reid said it "wouldn't affect gas prices at all." Then Reid did a 180: "We have to do something about exorbitant gas prices, and the best way to start with that is to do something about the five big oil companies getting subsidies they don't need."

Reid's issue spiel amused top Senate Republican Mitch McConnell. "Is it just me," he asked, "or is their message on their bill incredibly contradictory?"

Sen. Reid was right the first time. As Brian Johnson, API's senior tax advisor, explained recently, additional taxes on oil and natural gas companies would do nothing to lower prices. "They would not affect the global economics underpinning oil supply and demand, which explain today's gas prices," Johnson said. "They would, however, hurt the economy by reducing energy investment and the new jobs that would flow from that investment."

There's a clear choice before Congress: Move toward increasing access to America's domestic resources to help create jobs, raise government revenues and produce more energy - as the House of Representatives did with recent legislation - or continue pushing for higher taxes on energy companies, which a key study has shown would cost jobs, reduce government revenues and cut into energy production. When you think about it, it's not all that confusing.

Comments

Related

Blog Posts

Still Waiting for Cellulosic Biofuels – EPA Continues...

To pretty much no one’s surprise, EPA announced Friday that it is denying a petition that it reconsider its 2011 advanced cellulosi...

Blog Posts

On Disclosure Rule, SEC Should Heed White House

Common sense should be applied to a federal transparency proposal – the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s pending Section 1...

Blog Posts

Higher Supply = Higher Prices or NRDC Flunks Econ 101

Who could have imagined the day would come when the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) crafted a report focused on relieving...

Blog Posts

Massachusetts, Jobs and the Shale Energy Revolution

Interesting report in the Boston Globe about how a ripple of economic benefits from shale natural gas development is reaching a non...

Blog Posts

Apples, Oranges, and the Oil Sands

The Congressional Research Service (CRS) added to the pile of conflicting well-to-wheels analyses with its report released this wee...

Blog Posts

Generation Next: Securing Tomorrow’s Energy Industry...

Recently, ExxonMobil Development Co.’s L.M. Tillman addressed a gathering at the Offshore Technology Conference on the subject of e...

Blog Posts

Keystone XL: Safety, Reliability and Jobs

TransCanada President and CEO Russ Girling has a letter to the editor in the New York Times after the newspaper’s recent editorial...

Blog Posts

Stop-Gap Energy vs. Stable Energy

Scroll down a bit in this wrap-up of last weekend’s G8 Summit from The Hill newspaper, and you’ll see that the president and other...

Blog Posts

Made in America: Increase Access for Secure Energy Futu...

American-made energy. With the Energy Information Administration projecting that the United States will need more than 16 percent a...

Blog Posts

In an Election Year, Time to Talk Energy

Just a thought, but how great would it be if one of this fall’s presidential debates focused solely on energy issues? Past presid...

Blog Posts

Unused Leases? You’ve Got to be Joking!

The warmed-over claim that oil and natural gas companies aren’t using large numbers of leases on public lands is like a Mark Twain...

Stay Connected