Moratorium Not a Solution

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar made good on his promise Monday and issued a new drilling moratorium. As he stated in a news release:

"I am basing my decision on evidence that grows every day of the industry's inability in the deepwater to contain a catastrophic blowout, respond to an oil spill, and to operate safely."

Of course, the moratorium will do nothing to improve the engineering and geological knowledge required to solve the immediate problem. It won't help the industry contain blowouts. It won't improve spill-response technology. And it won't encourage safer operations. But it will put tens of thousands of Americans out of work, reduce domestic oil and natural gas production and make the United States increasingly reliant on other countries for energy.

API President and CEO Jack Gerard responded to the new moratorium, stating that it was "unnecessary and shortsighted...We strongly encourage the department to reconsider its decision and establish a process and timeline for putting our deepwater companies and highly skilled employees in the Gulf region back to work." And he wasn't the only one who disagreed with Sec. Salazar's moratorium.

Rep. Charlie Melacon (D-La.) said:

"At a time when we are already suffering from the BP oil disaster in the gulf, this continued suspension will cost our state more jobs and revenue...Louisianans have had enough and want to get back to producing energy for our nation."

Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) said:

"This was a rogue incident...This industry has a record. It's been a safe, reliable industry, with 42,000 wells drilled...." She also predicted that the moratorium will "force thousands of Louisianans into the unemployment line." (Times-Picayune/The Wall Street Journal)

Larry Dickerson, chief executive of Diamond Offshore Drilling, noted that his employees are asking about the difference between the auto industry and the oil industry. "They ask how come they get bailed out and we get driven out?" (The Washington Post)

Since last Friday, Diamond Offshore has moved two of its rigs from the Gulf to Egypt and the Congo rather than wait for the drilling ban to end.

Comments

Related

Blog Posts

Political Theater on Refined Exports

One of the flimsier arguments deployed against the Keystone XL pipeline is that the Canadian oil sands crude it would deliver to U.S...

Blog Posts

More Evidence of the Keystone XL Consensus

New polling on the Keystone XL pipeline shows consensus in America isn’t always elusive. The United Technologies/National Journal Co...

Blog Posts

Energy Works in Florida

Here’s what the oil and natural gas industry currently means to the state of Florida: More than $18 billion contributed to the...

Blog Posts

What Energy Progress Looks Like

Interesting piece by the Washington Post’s Robert Samuelson, analyzing America’s energy future in light of new government figures sh...

Blog Posts

Energy and the State of the Union

There were lots of energy mentions in the president’s State of the Union speech, and we appreciate every one of them because they li...

Blog Posts

Graphically Speaking: Producing Oil Offshore

Yesterday, we looked at the time it takes to produce oil on federal lands, now let’s look at offshore.  As you can see from the char...

Blog Posts

The Keystone XL Majority

New polling from Rasmussen Reports on the Keystone XL pipeline: “Most voters still favor building the Keystone XL pipeline from...

Blog Posts

Graphically Speaking: Future Global Energy Demand

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the world’s demand for energy is going to increase by nearly 50 perce...

Blog Posts

The Keystone XL, Cynicism and A Public Engaged

Hours after President Obama rejected the job-creating, energy-delivering Keystone XL pipeline, “The Fix” blogger Chris Cillizza, a l...

Blog Posts

Keystone and Consequences

Heather Zichal, Deputy Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change, writes: "But what’s abundantly clear is that t...

Blog Posts

Politics, Energy, and the President

As befitting a day when, for the president, political interest trumped the national interest, he opened his 2012 campaign advertisin...

Blog Posts

An Illogical Decision, Not An Arbitrary Deadline

In announcing his rejection of the Keystone XL permit, President Obama said: "This announcement is not a judgment on the merits...

Blog Posts

‘Mr. President, What Are You Thinking?’

As the above relates to President Obama’s decision to reject the Keystone XL pipeline, the answer is clear: politics. Even though...

Blog Posts

Rejecting the National Interest

I just read the best argument for the Keystone XL pipeline this morning: “… the addition of crude oil pipeline capacity between...

Blog Posts

The Keystone XL’s Real Jobs Numbers

In an economy with more than 13 million Americans out of work, every potential new job matters, right? Wrong, according to some Keys...

Stay Connected