Murkowski Says EPA GHG Regulations Are an “Economic Train Wreck”

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) yesterday introduced a bipartisan disapproval resolution to prevent the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from regulating greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) under the Clean Air Act.

Calling the proposed regulations an "economic train wreck," she told the Senate:

"...I continue to believe that this command-and-control approach is our worst option for reducing the emissions blamed for climate change. The Clean Air Act was written for Congress to regulate criteria pollutants, not greenhouse gases, and its implementation remains subject to oversight and guidance from elected representatives."

Murkowski said EPA's GHG regulations could close businesses, lay off workers, restrict U.S. energy production, make housing less affordable and raise the price of consumer goods. The resolution was co-sponsored by 35 Republicans and three Democrats.

As we reported yesterday, EPA's GHG regulations also could create a conundrum for states that have their own GHG regulations containing provisions that conflict with EPA's proposed regulations. Several states are seeking to delay the new regulations.

"...There will be severe consequences,"Murkowski warned in her floor speech."...Why would the EPA want to pursue these regulations right now, when we should be focused on getting our economy back on track?"

She added that several groups strongly oppose the EPA regulations, including the American Farm Bureau Federation, the National Taxpayers Union, and the Small Business Administration's Office of Advocacy.

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson responded by saying the disapproval resolution "asks each senator to deny the overwhelming science that greenhouse gas pollution is a real and serious threat to the health and welfare of our citizens." (The Washington Post)

Comments

Related

Blog Posts

‘Poisoned’ Politics, the Keystone XL and the Nation...

New York Times op-ed columnist Joe Nocera’s piece on the “poisoned” politics of the Keystone XL pipeline decision is a must read. Be...

Blog Posts

Energy Works in Minnesota

For the state of Minnesota, the oil and natural gas industry currently means: More than 117,000 jobs – with an average salary o...

Blog Posts

Energy Works in Colorado

Here’s what the oil and natural gas industry currently means to the state of Colorado: $20.5 billion contributed to the economy...

Blog Posts

Political Theater on Refined Exports

One of the flimsier arguments deployed against the Keystone XL pipeline is that the Canadian oil sands crude it would deliver to U.S...

Blog Posts

More Evidence of the Keystone XL Consensus

New polling on the Keystone XL pipeline shows consensus in America isn’t always elusive. The United Technologies/National Journal Co...

Blog Posts

Energy Works in Florida

Here’s what the oil and natural gas industry currently means to the state of Florida: More than $18 billion contributed to the...

Blog Posts

What Energy Progress Looks Like

Interesting piece by the Washington Post’s Robert Samuelson, analyzing America’s energy future in light of new government figures sh...

Blog Posts

Energy and the State of the Union

There were lots of energy mentions in the president’s State of the Union speech, and we appreciate every one of them because they li...

Blog Posts

The Keystone XL Majority

New polling from Rasmussen Reports on the Keystone XL pipeline: “Most voters still favor building the Keystone XL pipeline from...

Blog Posts

Graphically Speaking: Future Global Energy Demand

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the world’s demand for energy is going to increase by nearly 50 perce...

Blog Posts

The Keystone XL, Cynicism and A Public Engaged

Hours after President Obama rejected the job-creating, energy-delivering Keystone XL pipeline, “The Fix” blogger Chris Cillizza, a l...

Blog Posts

Keystone and Consequences

Heather Zichal, Deputy Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change, writes: "But what’s abundantly clear is that t...

Blog Posts

Politics, Energy, and the President

As befitting a day when, for the president, political interest trumped the national interest, he opened his 2012 campaign advertisin...

Blog Posts

An Illogical Decision, Not An Arbitrary Deadline

In announcing his rejection of the Keystone XL permit, President Obama said: "This announcement is not a judgment on the merits...

Blog Posts

‘Mr. President, What Are You Thinking?’

As the above relates to President Obama’s decision to reject the Keystone XL pipeline, the answer is clear: politics. Even though...

Blog Posts

Rejecting the National Interest

I just read the best argument for the Keystone XL pipeline this morning: “… the addition of crude oil pipeline capacity between...

Blog Posts

The Keystone XL’s Real Jobs Numbers

In an economy with more than 13 million Americans out of work, every potential new job matters, right? Wrong, according to some Keys...

Blog Posts

What Would You Do?

Compelling video from the office of U.S. House Speaker John Boehner that cuts to the heart of the case for approving the Keystone XL...

Stay Connected