Penalizing the Oil Industry Hurts Jobs, Economy

Rather than deal with the Gulf oil spill in a reasoned fashion, the administration and some in Congress have put forth a barrage of political proposals that could jeopardize jobs and domestic energy production, and deal heavy blows to the economy overall.

Seemingly aimed at preventing a similar accident, these proposals--a six-month moratorium, unlimited liability and tax increases--will do nothing to promote offshore drilling safety. Instead, they could threaten hundreds of thousands of U.S. jobs, cost billions in government revenue and royalties, and limit a major part of the nation's energy lifeline.

When asked recently about the most important issue for the federal government to address, people emphatically responded, "jobs" and "the economy." So why are policymakers ignoring what people want?

As I mentioned in an op-ed this week, most Americans understand that this industry--with its focus on the spill, safe operations, job creation and economic recovery--is not our economy's enemy. They know that energy development is a primary driver of job creation. That's why voters in 10 key states oppose higher taxes on America's oil and natural gas industry by a 2-to-1 margin.

Safety improvements are possible without risking jobs. Working together, the industry and government are making progress toward establishing a safer offshore operating environment. But with 15 million people out of work, proposals in Washington should protect taxpayers and advance our country's energy and economic interests, not penalize the oil and natural gas industry.

We must let common sense prevail over short-sighted efforts to use the spill as an excuse to punish oil and natural gas companies--and ultimately hard-working Americans. We are doing our part. And we urge our leaders in Washington to as well.

Editors note: Jack Gerard sent this message yesterday to individuals signed up to receive Energy Tomorrow e-mail communications. Click here to sign up for Energy Tomorrow updates and stay informed about important energy issues.

For more information, watch Jack Gerard in the video below explains how bills introduced in response to the Deepwater Horizon incident could harm U.S. job creation, economic growth, and energy security.

Comments

Related

Blog Posts

Shale Energy in Ohio = Jobs, Economic Hope

More evidence that shale energy in Ohio is looming as an economic dynamo. First, an op-ed from the Coshocton Tribune discusses wa...

Blog Posts

Made in America: Common-Sense Energy Regulatory Structu...

We talked recently about increasing access to domestic oil and natural gas as key to a made-in-America energy plan. Here’s another...

Blog Posts

Still Waiting for Cellulosic Biofuels – EPA Continues...

To pretty much no one’s surprise, EPA announced Friday that it is denying a petition that it reconsider its 2011 advanced cellulosi...

Blog Posts

On Disclosure Rule, SEC Should Heed White House

Common sense should be applied to a federal transparency proposal – the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s pending Section 1...

Blog Posts

Higher Supply = Higher Prices or NRDC Flunks Econ 101

Who could have imagined the day would come when the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) crafted a report focused on relieving...

Blog Posts

Report: Industry Commitment to Workplace Health, Safety...

According to a new API report, the U.S. oil and natural gas industry’s workplace safety record measures favorably with the private...

Blog Posts

Massachusetts, Jobs and the Shale Energy Revolution

Interesting report in the Boston Globe about how a ripple of economic benefits from shale natural gas development is reaching a non...

Blog Posts

Apples, Oranges, and the Oil Sands

The Congressional Research Service (CRS) added to the pile of conflicting well-to-wheels analyses with its report released this wee...

Stay Connected