Photos and Context on Oil Sands

From a post on the Climate Progress website (cross-posted on Grist), on the environmental effects of Canadian oil sands production:

“Extraction of Alberta's energy-intensive tar sands has expanded steadily in recent years, with about 232 square miles now exposed by mining operations. Tar-sands production is expected to double over the next decade, which could mean the destruction of 740,000 acres of boreal forest …”

The post includes photo comparisons – purportedly depicting the before and after of oil sands development. It looks/sounds dreadful. One commenter to the site writes, “What a beautiful country it was …”

Actually, Canada still is a very beautiful country, including Alberta’s oil sands region. Lacking in the Climate Progress post is valuable context. There’s this from Yale University’s School of Forestry and Environmental Studies:

“Canada’s boreal forest stretches from British Columbia to Newfoundland, covering 2.2 million square miles, an area nearly 60 percent the size of the United States, including Alaska. Much of Canada’s boreal is intact, making it — along with the Russian taiga and the remaining, undisturbed portions of the Amazon — one of three great tracts of forest on the globe.”

OK, let’s do the math. Multiply 2.2 million square miles by 640 (the number of acres in a square mile). That comes to 1,408,000,000 acres of boreal forest in Canada. Now, divide 1.4 billion by 740,000 and you get 0.05 percent – as in five-hundredths of a percent of Canada’s boreal forest could be affected if the country’s oil sands resources are fully developed.

A couple of other things the Climate Progress post leaves out. First, Canadians are very protective of their environment, and by law oil sands development areas have to be restored to their natural state by companies operating there. Suncor, for example, has developed a way to reclaim its tailings ponds, as well as a process that will eliminate the need for tailings ponds altogether. Here’s a photo of a former tailings pond – transformed into a lush meadow with hundreds of thousands of tree seedlings planted.

Bottom line: For a small, temporary footprint in Canada’s vast boreal forest, we get stable energy from a friend and ally and job creation, right here in the United States.

Comments

Related

Blog Posts

Shale Energy in Ohio = Jobs, Economic Hope

More evidence that shale energy in Ohio is looming as an economic dynamo. First, an op-ed from the Coshocton Tribune discusses wa...

Blog Posts

Higher Supply = Higher Prices or NRDC Flunks Econ 101

Who could have imagined the day would come when the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) crafted a report focused on relieving...

Blog Posts

Report: Industry Commitment to Workplace Health, Safety...

According to a new API report, the U.S. oil and natural gas industry’s workplace safety record measures favorably with the private...

Blog Posts

Massachusetts, Jobs and the Shale Energy Revolution

Interesting report in the Boston Globe about how a ripple of economic benefits from shale natural gas development is reaching a non...

Blog Posts

Apples, Oranges, and the Oil Sands

The Congressional Research Service (CRS) added to the pile of conflicting well-to-wheels analyses with its report released this wee...

Blog Posts

Generation Next: Securing Tomorrow’s Energy Industry...

Recently, ExxonMobil Development Co.’s L.M. Tillman addressed a gathering at the Offshore Technology Conference on the subject of e...

Blog Posts

Keystone XL: Safety, Reliability and Jobs

TransCanada President and CEO Russ Girling has a letter to the editor in the New York Times after the newspaper’s recent editorial...

Stay Connected