Pressure Mounts Against Deepwater Drilling Ban

The Department of the Interior (DOI) late yesterday sent out a list of new safety requirements to offshore drillers as pressure mounted against the drilling moratorium.

The requirements, issued as a Notice to Lessees (NTL), requires the CEOs of offshore companies to certify they are in compliance will all regulations. In addition, the operators must provide certification from a professional engineer of all well casing and cement design requirements as well as independent third-party verification that the blowout preventer will operate properly.

API supports the goal of making offshore energy production as safe and environmentally sensitive as possible, but it encouraged the administration to reconsider the deepwater drilling moratorium. "Independent analyses have indicated the six-month moratorium on new drilling in the deep waters of the Gulf could result in a production loss of between 80,000 and 130,000 barrels per day and idle nearly 50,000 workers in the already hard-hit Gulf states," API said in a statement.

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal estimates the deepwater drilling freeze will cost 3,000 to 6,000 jobs in his state alone in the next two to three weeks and as many as 10,000 in coming months. As The Wall Street Journal observes, "To put that in context, the entire U.S. economy created only 41,000 new private jobs in May."

The Houston Chronicle reports one oil company has gone to court to reverse the moratorium. Hornbeck Offshore Services, Inc. is suing Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, Minerals Management Service (MMS) Acting Director Bob Abbey and their agencies, calling the decision to impose a moratorium "arbitrary, capricious" and "an abuse of discretion." The suit asks the U.S. District Court in the Eastern District of Louisiana to declare the moratorium "invalid and unenforceable" under existing regulations.

Further, seven experts who were involved in the Interior Department's report to the president on offshore safety say Interior Secretary Ken Salazar is falsely implying they supported the moratorium. In a joint letter, they say, "[We] do not agree with the six month blanket moratorium... A moratorium was added after the final review and was never agreed to by the contributors." Today's Times-Picayune contains an excerpt from the letter, saying:

"A blanket moratorium is not the answer. It will not measurably reduce risk further and it will have a lasting impact on the nation's economy which may be greater than that of the oil spill...We do not believe punishing the innocent is the right thing to do."

Echoing their remarks, Kenneth H. Beer of Stone Energy Corp. sent an open letter to President Obama saying, "In South Louisiana, we have certainly had more than our fair share of catastrophes over the past five years. Do not add another one by implementing this moratorium."

Comments

Related

Blog Posts

Why 75% is an ‘F’

“…tonight, I’m directing my administration to open more than 75 percent of our potential offshore oil and gas resources.” -  Preside...

Blog Posts

What Energy Progress Looks Like

Interesting piece by the Washington Post’s Robert Samuelson, analyzing America’s energy future in light of new government figures sh...

Blog Posts

Energy and the State of the Union

There were lots of energy mentions in the president’s State of the Union speech, and we appreciate every one of them because they li...

Blog Posts

Graphically Speaking: Producing Oil Offshore

Yesterday, we looked at the time it takes to produce oil on federal lands, now let’s look at offshore.  As you can see from the char...

Blog Posts

Graphically Speaking: Future Global Energy Demand

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the world’s demand for energy is going to increase by nearly 50 perce...

Blog Posts

The Keystone XL, Cynicism and A Public Engaged

Hours after President Obama rejected the job-creating, energy-delivering Keystone XL pipeline, “The Fix” blogger Chris Cillizza, a l...

Blog Posts

Keystone and Consequences

Heather Zichal, Deputy Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change, writes: "But what’s abundantly clear is that t...

Blog Posts

An Illogical Decision, Not An Arbitrary Deadline

In announcing his rejection of the Keystone XL permit, President Obama said: "This announcement is not a judgment on the merits...

Blog Posts

‘Mr. President, What Are You Thinking?’

As the above relates to President Obama’s decision to reject the Keystone XL pipeline, the answer is clear: politics. Even though...

Blog Posts

Rejecting the National Interest

I just read the best argument for the Keystone XL pipeline this morning: “… the addition of crude oil pipeline capacity between...

Blog Posts

The Keystone XL’s Real Jobs Numbers

In an economy with more than 13 million Americans out of work, every potential new job matters, right? Wrong, according to some Keys...

Blog Posts

What Would You Do?

Compelling video from the office of U.S. House Speaker John Boehner that cuts to the heart of the case for approving the Keystone XL...

Blog Posts

The White House’s Natural Gas/Manufacturing Connectio...

From where we sit, a new White House report that gives substantial credit to natural gas production for recent growth in U.S. manufa...

Blog Posts

About Those Net Exports…

News that the United States was a net exporter of finished petroleum products last year prompts logical questions – and some wronghe...

Blog Posts

Study: Effects of Gulf Drilling Policies Detailed

Policies have consequences. Certainly, we’ve seen economic impact in the 2010 decision to halt deepwater drilling in the Gulf of Mex...

Stay Connected