Study: New Drilling Regulations Could Eliminate Jobs, Increase Costs

Last week, Grant Thornton LLP released a study--"The implications of the oil spill on deepwater exploration and production"--that outlines the impacts of new, proposed offshore drilling regulations. The analysis found that these regulations would likely increase costs for Gulf energy exploration and production (E&P) businesses and adversely impact the future of Gulf offshore drilling.

The study states that "as a result of the oil spill, the future costs of drilling and operating in the Gulf will rise considerably" due to the following factors:

  • Insurance increases, estimated to jump as much as 50 percent, resulting in higher daily drilling rates;
  • Higher capital costs with investors and creditors demanding higher returns; and
  • Significant regulation changes, such as removing the liability cap, increasing civil and criminal spill penalties, greater redundancy in drilling safety equipment, stricter requirements for permits and more federal inspectors.

Regulation changes could lead to fewer American jobs, increase the costs of energy and decrease U.S. energy security, making U.S. companies less competitive in the global race for energy. Loretta Cross, managing partner of Grant Thornton LLP's CARS practice and co-author of the white paper says:

"Policymakers need a balanced outlook; they should consider a number of factors when making long-term regulatory changes affecting the oil and gas industry."

Americans want and deserve offshore safety improvements, but they should not be so onerous that they put thousands of people out of work and increase the nation's reliance on foreign sources of energy.

The Gulf has an abundance of oil and natural gas to increase U.S. domestic production. The United States can have both--offshore safety and the energy the nation needs.

Comments

Related

Blog Posts

Forestalling a ‘Regulatory Avalanche’

John Felmy, API’s chief economist, talked to reporters this week about a looming federal “regulatory avalanche” that could impact th...

Blog Posts

‘Poisoned’ Politics, the Keystone XL and the Nation...

New York Times op-ed columnist Joe Nocera’s piece on the “poisoned” politics of the Keystone XL pipeline decision is a must read. Be...

Blog Posts

Survey Says, Misinformation on Energy, Keystone XL

Politico reports (subscription required) this week on a new poll that shows a political edge for the president on energy and jobs –...

Blog Posts

Energy Works in Minnesota

For the state of Minnesota, the oil and natural gas industry currently means: More than 117,000 jobs – with an average salary o...

Blog Posts

Energy Works in Colorado

Here’s what the oil and natural gas industry currently means to the state of Colorado: $20.5 billion contributed to the economy...

Blog Posts

Blogger Conference Call – SOTU Follow Up

Last week, API hosted a blogger conference call to follow up on President Obama’s State of the Union remarks. API Senior Tax Policy...

Blog Posts

Political Theater on Refined Exports

One of the flimsier arguments deployed against the Keystone XL pipeline is that the Canadian oil sands crude it would deliver to U.S...

Blog Posts

Hydraulic Fracturing Workshops Launched

This week API is launching a series of hydraulic fracturing workshops in shale energy states to continue the conversation on industr...

Blog Posts

More Evidence of the Keystone XL Consensus

New polling on the Keystone XL pipeline shows consensus in America isn’t always elusive. The United Technologies/National Journal Co...

Blog Posts

Energy Works in Florida

Here’s what the oil and natural gas industry currently means to the state of Florida: More than $18 billion contributed to the...

Stay Connected