The Senate’s Climate Bill

Sens. Barbara Boxer and John Kerry are expected to release their version of a climate bill tomorrow. News reports say the bill is meant to be a starting point for the Senate's deliberations.

Although reports say it will be based on the Waxman-Markey bill that passed narrowly through the House, it will lack detail on many of the key issues. For example, it will not prescribe how carbon allowances are supposed to be distributed among various industries. And unlike the House bill, the Senate version will contain nuclear power and clean coal provisions.

The Senate's climate legislation also will propose a tougher limit on carbon emissions than the Waxman-Markey bill. It will seek to reduce emissions by 20 percent of the 2005 level in 2020, rather than the 17 percent reduction contained in the House bill.

Already one group of senators is voicing concerns about the Senate bill. In a letter to Sen. Boxer, the bipartisan group said, "We write today to advocate for policies which will ensure any climate and energy bill take optimal advantage of America's abundance of clean-burning natural gas to dramatically lower emissions in both the near and long term." According to one report, the senators want natural gas-fueled power plants to receive the same incentives as coal plants.

Meanwhile, the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) today accused the Treasury Department of continuing to hide information on the cost of climate legislation. In a news release, CEI said it had notified the Treasury Department of its intent to sue over the administration's "inadequate disclosure of documents" recently requested under the Freedom of Information Act.

Documents released by the Treasury Department two weeks ago show the administration believed climate legislation could cost as much as $300 billion per year, which was much higher than the government's public estimates, and could result in companies moving overseas. Studies have shown that the Waxman-Markey bill could eliminate 2 million American jobs a year.

The Senate is expected to take up the climate bill after it completes its work on the health care plan.

Comments

Related

Blog Posts

In an Election Year, Time to Talk Energy

Just a thought, but how great would it be if one of this fall’s presidential debates focused solely on energy issues? Past presid...

Blog Posts

Watch Live: Energy in an Election Year

.blog #main .post-body .video-wrapper { width:500px; height:418px; padding:0; overflow:visible; margin:0 auto 18px; } ....

Blog Posts

Job Creation To-Do List? Here’s Ours

Here’s the president talking about job creation Tuesday in Albany, N.Y.: “Now, we know the true engine of job creation in this...

Blog Posts

To the President’s Ear: Build the Keystone XL

In an interview with Fox Business Channel this week, billionaire Warren Buffett voiced support for construction of the Keystone XL...

Blog Posts

Facts, Not Excuses, Should Guide Decision on Re-Routed...

It’s good to hear that TransCanada has submitted its new application for a presidential permit to build the Keystone XL pipeline. T...

Blog Posts

All For Efficiency

A recent post on the White House Blog updates the administration’s effort to see federal agencies make at least $2 billion in energ...

Blog Posts

Hey, Jay Carney, You Forgot Something!

POLITICO Pro Energy reports that while talking to reporters about crucifixion comments by EPA’s Region 6 administrator, White House...

Blog Posts

‘If I Wanted America to Fail …’

Here’s an abbreviated version of a video by Free Market America on administration policies that the group says are undermining dome...

Blog Posts

EPA Regulation and Crucifixion

Fox News reports that EPA’s Region 6 administrator has apologized for comparing his agency’s enforcement strategy to Roman crucifix...

Blog Posts

The Right and Wrong Side of the Energy Divide

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar talked about a divide in America between the “real energy world and the imagined energy world” durin...

Blog Posts

No More Excuses on Keystone XL

In response to a question about the Keystone XL pipeline back in January, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney told reporters: “[...

Blog Posts

Mr. President, Approve This Pipeline

No more political posturing, no more pretending the only thing holding up the Keystone XL pipeline is that it needs more study, Mr....

Blog Posts

Administration’s Energy Proposals: Less Than Meets th...

With a nod to H.L. Mencken, who made art out of presidential punditry nearly a century ago, the current president’s election-year e...

Blog Posts

The President’s Actions, and Rising Prices

Is President Obama the “anti-energy” president, as former Gov. Pete Du Pont argues in an op-ed piece for the Wall Street Journal (s...

Blog Posts

Bunk on Oil Issues

Normally, we don’t bother with blog posts from the Center for American Progress on oil issues because, to borrow from an old saying...

Blog Posts

Raising Energy Taxes – The Wrong Approach

Update: The U.S. Senate failed to reach the 60 votes needed to invoke cloture and the motion failed 51-47. (29 Mar 2012) Today th...

Blog Posts

Blogger Conference Call – Gas Prices

Earlier this week, API hosted a conference call with bloggers to discuss rising gasoline prices and to correct misinformation about...

Blog Posts

Working Through the Tax Hike Spin

With the U.S. Senate getting ready to debate proposals that would raise taxes on American energy companies, the White House blog sp...

Blog Posts

Throwing Down An Energy Challenge

Let’s talk about a fundamental difference of opinion on the key energy issue of the day. We say crude oil supply matters – in the...

Blog Posts

To the President’s Ear on Energy

As the president hits the road to talk about energy, he should first listen to what the American people are saying, reflected in tw...

Stay Connected