Update on Climate Legislation

Perhaps it's the weak economy, or perhaps it's ClimateGate. Whatever the cause, it appears that support for climate change legislation is waning.

  • Several members of Congress have predicted that climate legislation will not be enacted this year.
  • On Tuesday, three corporations, including two oil and natural gas companies, announced that they are pulling out of the U.S. Climate Action Partnership.
  • The Western Climate Initiative also appears to be losing members. The Arizona state government has left, and according to reports, Utah is considering leaving the group.
  • Last night Yvo de Boer, the United Nation's top climate change official, announced his resignation. AP reports that he "is known to be deeply disappointed with the outcome of the last summit in Copenhagen...."

Meanwhile, reports continue to pile up on the potentially devastating economic impact of Waxman-Markey-style climate legislation. A new study shows Texas could lose more than 5 percent of its manufacturing output and see electricity prices rise by as much as 52 percent by 2030 under climate legislation.

The Houston Chronicle reports the study was commissioned by the Texas Public Policy Foundation. Margot Thorning was one of two authors of the study. "If pending legislation such as the Waxman-Markey bill is enacted, the Texas economy will experience slower growth and thousands of valuable jobs will be lost," Thorning said. "Energy-intensive industries with foreign competition could reduce their operations in Texas and relocate in countries without similar mandates."

Thorning's findings are consistent with those of other studies, including one released by the state Comptroller's Office showing that Waxman-Markey climate legislation could destroy 170,000 to 425,000 jobs in Texas and reduce the state's GDP by as much as $58 billion by 2030.

With unemployment near 10 percent, now is not the time to consider legislation that could cut U.S. jobs, raise energy costs, and reduce economic growth. Instead, Congress should encourage the expansion of domestic oil and natural gas development to create jobs, raise revenue for badly needed government programs, and improve U.S. energy security.

Comments

Related

Blog Posts

Political Theater on Refined Exports

One of the flimsier arguments deployed against the Keystone XL pipeline is that the Canadian oil sands crude it would deliver to U.S...

Blog Posts

More Evidence of the Keystone XL Consensus

New polling on the Keystone XL pipeline shows consensus in America isn’t always elusive. The United Technologies/National Journal Co...

Blog Posts

Energy Works in Florida

Here’s what the oil and natural gas industry currently means to the state of Florida: More than $18 billion contributed to the...

Blog Posts

What Energy Progress Looks Like

Interesting piece by the Washington Post’s Robert Samuelson, analyzing America’s energy future in light of new government figures sh...

Blog Posts

Energy and the State of the Union

There were lots of energy mentions in the president’s State of the Union speech, and we appreciate every one of them because they li...

Blog Posts

The Keystone XL Majority

New polling from Rasmussen Reports on the Keystone XL pipeline: “Most voters still favor building the Keystone XL pipeline from...

Blog Posts

Graphically Speaking: Future Global Energy Demand

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the world’s demand for energy is going to increase by nearly 50 perce...

Blog Posts

The Keystone XL, Cynicism and A Public Engaged

Hours after President Obama rejected the job-creating, energy-delivering Keystone XL pipeline, “The Fix” blogger Chris Cillizza, a l...

Blog Posts

Keystone and Consequences

Heather Zichal, Deputy Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change, writes: "But what’s abundantly clear is that t...

Blog Posts

Politics, Energy, and the President

As befitting a day when, for the president, political interest trumped the national interest, he opened his 2012 campaign advertisin...

Blog Posts

An Illogical Decision, Not An Arbitrary Deadline

In announcing his rejection of the Keystone XL permit, President Obama said: "This announcement is not a judgment on the merits...

Blog Posts

‘Mr. President, What Are You Thinking?’

As the above relates to President Obama’s decision to reject the Keystone XL pipeline, the answer is clear: politics. Even though...

Blog Posts

Rejecting the National Interest

I just read the best argument for the Keystone XL pipeline this morning: “… the addition of crude oil pipeline capacity between...

Blog Posts

The Keystone XL’s Real Jobs Numbers

In an economy with more than 13 million Americans out of work, every potential new job matters, right? Wrong, according to some Keys...

Blog Posts

What Would You Do?

Compelling video from the office of U.S. House Speaker John Boehner that cuts to the heart of the case for approving the Keystone XL...

Blog Posts

The White House’s Natural Gas/Manufacturing Connectio...

From where we sit, a new White House report that gives substantial credit to natural gas production for recent growth in U.S. manufa...

Blog Posts

About Those Net Exports…

News that the United States was a net exporter of finished petroleum products last year prompts logical questions – and some wronghe...

Stay Connected