Utah Pushing for Energy Development

govherbert.jpg

Utah Gov. Gary Herbert has signed a law that would allow his state to file eminent domain proceedings against the federal government.

The goal: to gain control of state lands where energy development cannot occur because they are surrounded by protected federal lands.

Since the U.S. Constitution prohibits condemning federal lands, it's unlikely that Gov. Herbert will prevail in court, but his action is sending a message to Washington where energy-rich lands have been put off-limits by the federal government.

"When the donkey doesn't move," the governor said at a news conference, "you need to hit him across the head with a two-by-four just to get their attention." (The Wall Street Journal)

Energy development can generate well-paying jobs and provide economic opportunity. Pennsylvania, for example, is experiencing significant job growth as a result of the Marcellus Shale development.

Furthermore, an ICF International study found that opening off-limits areas in the United States to energy development could create 160,000 jobs, greatly reduce the trade deficit, and raise $1.7 trillion in government revenues to pay for services. In Utah, royalty payments from energy development would go to the state's schools.

But there are many areas both onshore and offshore where oil and natural gas development is prohibited, and more areas are in danger of being placed off-limits.

  • Earlier this month, the U.S. Forest Service dropped two parcels in West Virginia from a federal oil and natural gas lease sale;
  • In Montana, a federal judge has approved the nation's first settlement requiring the government to suspend 38,000 acres of oil and natural gas leases so it can determine how energy development activities might affect the climate; and
  • A similar suit involving 70,000 acres is pending in New Mexico.

The people of the oil and natural gas industry take seriously their role in protecting the environment. They also recognize that energy demand is growing--for alternatives, renewables, biomass, and coal, as well as for oil and natural gas.

America needs a balanced energy policy that encourages energy development, creates jobs, and contains environmental safeguards. It needs a policy that cares for people as well as the environment.

(Image source: Utah.gov)

Comments

Related

Blog Posts

Higher Supply = Higher Prices or NRDC Flunks Econ 101

Who could have imagined the day would come when the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) crafted a report focused on relieving...

Blog Posts

Report: Industry Commitment to Workplace Health, Safety...

According to a new API report, the U.S. oil and natural gas industry’s workplace safety record measures favorably with the private...

Blog Posts

Massachusetts, Jobs and the Shale Energy Revolution

Interesting report in the Boston Globe about how a ripple of economic benefits from shale natural gas development is reaching a non...

Blog Posts

Apples, Oranges, and the Oil Sands

The Congressional Research Service (CRS) added to the pile of conflicting well-to-wheels analyses with its report released this wee...

Blog Posts

Generation Next: Securing Tomorrow’s Energy Industry...

Recently, ExxonMobil Development Co.’s L.M. Tillman addressed a gathering at the Offshore Technology Conference on the subject of e...

Blog Posts

Keystone XL: Safety, Reliability and Jobs

TransCanada President and CEO Russ Girling has a letter to the editor in the New York Times after the newspaper’s recent editorial...

Blog Posts

Stop-Gap Energy vs. Stable Energy

Scroll down a bit in this wrap-up of last weekend’s G8 Summit from The Hill newspaper, and you’ll see that the president and other...

Stay Connected