Voters Support Offshore Drilling, Government Creates Obstacles

A new Rasmussen poll shows that support for offshore oil and natural gas development is holding steady despite the Deepwater Horizon accident. In a survey conducted July 22-23 via telephone, 56 percent of U.S. voters think offshore drilling should be allowed, and 47 percent favor deepwater drilling.

Unfortunately, new offshore development has ground to a standstill, and shallow-water drilling operators have discovered that complying with the government's new requirements is quite difficult. Blogger Vladimir at RedState says, "Operators have encountered road blocks at every turn."

The recertification of blowout preventers (BOPs) is one of the major obstacles. Only a few firms are licensed to perform the certifications, creating a backlog of operators whose BOPs must be recertified before getting a drilling permit.

Similarly, pipeline projects have been held up because the government no longer offers blanket Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) which acknowledge that none of these routine installations is unique. Vlad says, "Now they must be assessed for the need for individual EISs, and the agency has no standards upon which to make the assessment."

Drilling permits also depend on a calculation of a "Worst Case Discharge," which Vlad calls "a theoretical and speculative exercise based on unknowable parameters" leading to debates between operators and government personnel which "are the engineering equivalent of arguing how many angels can dance on the head of a pin--there being no right answer, the issue can be (and is) debated ad infinitum."

Tens of thousands of men and women who depend on the oil and natural gas industry for their livelihoods could be harmed by the government's actions. And American consumers, who depend on oil and natural gas for energy, are likely to be hurt as domestic energy supplies dwindle and U.S. energy security declines.

As the new Rasmussen poll indicates, American voters recognize the offshore energy workers' value to the economy and want them to go back to work. The poll shows 65 percent feel finding new sources of energy is more important than reducing the amount of energy that Americans consume.

Comments

Related

Blog Posts

Royalties and Fair Shares

Great post by the American Enterprise Institute’s Steven Hayward (similar version posted on Powerline), breaking down a recent study...

Blog Posts

‘Poisoned’ Politics, the Keystone XL and the Nation...

New York Times op-ed columnist Joe Nocera’s piece on the “poisoned” politics of the Keystone XL pipeline decision is a must read. Be...

Blog Posts

Energy Works in Minnesota

For the state of Minnesota, the oil and natural gas industry currently means: More than 117,000 jobs – with an average salary o...

Blog Posts

Energy Works in Colorado

Here’s what the oil and natural gas industry currently means to the state of Colorado: $20.5 billion contributed to the economy...

Blog Posts

Blogger Conference Call – SOTU Follow Up

Last week, API hosted a blogger conference call to follow up on President Obama’s State of the Union remarks. API Senior Tax Policy...

Blog Posts

What Energy Progress Looks Like

Interesting piece by the Washington Post’s Robert Samuelson, analyzing America’s energy future in light of new government figures sh...

Blog Posts

Energy and the State of the Union

There were lots of energy mentions in the president’s State of the Union speech, and we appreciate every one of them because they li...

Blog Posts

Graphically Speaking: Producing Oil Offshore

Yesterday, we looked at the time it takes to produce oil on federal lands, now let’s look at offshore.  As you can see from the char...

Blog Posts

Graphically Speaking: Future Global Energy Demand

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the world’s demand for energy is going to increase by nearly 50 perce...

Blog Posts

The Keystone XL, Cynicism and A Public Engaged

Hours after President Obama rejected the job-creating, energy-delivering Keystone XL pipeline, “The Fix” blogger Chris Cillizza, a l...

Blog Posts

Keystone and Consequences

Heather Zichal, Deputy Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change, writes: "But what’s abundantly clear is that t...

Blog Posts

An Illogical Decision, Not An Arbitrary Deadline

In announcing his rejection of the Keystone XL permit, President Obama said: "This announcement is not a judgment on the merits...

Blog Posts

‘Mr. President, What Are You Thinking?’

As the above relates to President Obama’s decision to reject the Keystone XL pipeline, the answer is clear: politics. Even though...

Stay Connected