Willing to Pay $200 a Month for Climate Legislation?

A recent poll shows that the more Americans learn about climate legislation, the less they like it. Especially when they realize that it will take money out of their pockets.

How much money? About $2,300 per year per average U.S. household, according to the American Farm Bureau. That's nearly $200 a month.

The Farm Bureau calculated this figure by adding the Energy Information Administration's (EIA) estimate of higher energy costs ($1,870 per year) under the Waxman-Markey bill with its own estimate of the legislation's impact on food prices. The total cost: up to $200 billion per year for U.S. consumers, which equates to a 15 percent hike in personal income taxes.

"Can you [imagine] how consumers in this country would scream if they knew they would be hit with a 15 percent hike in their personal income taxes?" asks Bob Stallman, president of the American Farm Bureau.

Bob says consumers "have a big stake" in the proposed climate bills. Take the legislation's potential impact on food supplies. He says farmers are likely to produce less food as their energy costs rise, and some could be tempted to plant trees as carbon offsets rather than grow crops. Furthermore, he says this legislation is being debated at a time when international organizations are wondering how to raise food production by 70 percent to feed an estimated world population of 9.1 billion people in 2050.

"We're heading in the wrong direction with this bill," Bob says.

Analyses by the Farm Bureau and others indicate that the climate legislation under consideration could make everyone in America poorer and take food off our plates, while shifting emissions from the United States to other countries where environmental protection is less stringent.

Voice your concern about the bills now by joining Energy Citizens and taking action.

Comments

Related

Blog Posts

‘Poisoned’ Politics, the Keystone XL and the Nation...

New York Times op-ed columnist Joe Nocera’s piece on the “poisoned” politics of the Keystone XL pipeline decision is a must read. Be...

Blog Posts

Energy Works in Minnesota

For the state of Minnesota, the oil and natural gas industry currently means: More than 117,000 jobs – with an average salary o...

Blog Posts

Energy Works in Colorado

Here’s what the oil and natural gas industry currently means to the state of Colorado: $20.5 billion contributed to the economy...

Blog Posts

Political Theater on Refined Exports

One of the flimsier arguments deployed against the Keystone XL pipeline is that the Canadian oil sands crude it would deliver to U.S...

Blog Posts

More Evidence of the Keystone XL Consensus

New polling on the Keystone XL pipeline shows consensus in America isn’t always elusive. The United Technologies/National Journal Co...

Blog Posts

Energy Works in Florida

Here’s what the oil and natural gas industry currently means to the state of Florida: More than $18 billion contributed to the...

Blog Posts

What Energy Progress Looks Like

Interesting piece by the Washington Post’s Robert Samuelson, analyzing America’s energy future in light of new government figures sh...

Blog Posts

Energy and the State of the Union

There were lots of energy mentions in the president’s State of the Union speech, and we appreciate every one of them because they li...

Blog Posts

The Keystone XL Majority

New polling from Rasmussen Reports on the Keystone XL pipeline: “Most voters still favor building the Keystone XL pipeline from...

Blog Posts

Natural Gas: The 70 Percent

The outstanding statistic in the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s preview of its 2012 Annual Energy Outlook is the forecast...

Blog Posts

Graphically Speaking: Future Global Energy Demand

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the world’s demand for energy is going to increase by nearly 50 perce...

Blog Posts

The Keystone XL, Cynicism and A Public Engaged

Hours after President Obama rejected the job-creating, energy-delivering Keystone XL pipeline, “The Fix” blogger Chris Cillizza, a l...

Blog Posts

Keystone and Consequences

Heather Zichal, Deputy Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change, writes: "But what’s abundantly clear is that t...

Blog Posts

Politics, Energy, and the President

As befitting a day when, for the president, political interest trumped the national interest, he opened his 2012 campaign advertisin...

Blog Posts

An Illogical Decision, Not An Arbitrary Deadline

In announcing his rejection of the Keystone XL permit, President Obama said: "This announcement is not a judgment on the merits...

Blog Posts

‘Mr. President, What Are You Thinking?’

As the above relates to President Obama’s decision to reject the Keystone XL pipeline, the answer is clear: politics. Even though...

Blog Posts

Rejecting the National Interest

I just read the best argument for the Keystone XL pipeline this morning: “… the addition of crude oil pipeline capacity between...

Blog Posts

The Keystone XL’s Real Jobs Numbers

In an economy with more than 13 million Americans out of work, every potential new job matters, right? Wrong, according to some Keys...

Stay Connected