A "consensus has concluded that EPA fuel standards are sorely at odds with the interests of fuel and food consumers in the United States,” writes contributor Robert Bradley. “The direct economic cost of implementing and enforcing these fuel standards far outweighs the questionable benefits."
The Washington Post – Keystone XL Opposition Wanes Among Nebraska Landowners
With the Keystone XL debate set to head back to Nebraska today, the Post reports that folks in the state “largely support the pipeline project.”
Star-Gazette – Anti-Fracking Equals Pro-Poverty for New York
In the heart of the fracking moratorium debate in New York’s Southern Tier, Corning resident Mike Morrongiello writes a guest column on the booming econom... more »