The ‘Use It or Lose It’ Deception

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar had some good things to say yesterday:

"Applications for federal permits to drill on public and American Indian lands are expected to increase by close to 50 percent, U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said Tuesday."

Yes! Absolutely yes! The oil and natural gas industry already invests heavily in America and stands ready to invest even more.

"He also said he expects his agency to approve more offshore drilling permits in the coming days."

Yes! Absolutely yes! It would be wonderful if the federal government would let us make that investment in America. But then the good news stopped as the secretary followed that with the administration's latest misinformation about oil and natural gas development...

"It's important for us to recognize that the inventory that has been leased out to oil and gas companies is 41 million acres and only 12 million of that has been developed at this point, so that means there's a huge amount of inventory of public lands where there has been interest on the part of oil and gas companies to lease those lands and they have in fact been leased," he said.

...joining other Democratic leaders on the "no" energy policy bandwagon. This from Senator Reid's office Tuesday:

"Oil and gas companies are currently sitting on approximately 60 million acres of oil and gas leases that are going unused. At the same time they are holding back on domestic production, these same oil companies are reaping record profits from high gas prices. And Republicans are protecting this shell game, at a high cost to consumers."

When it comes to crafting a sensible energy policy, once again politics carry the day. This notion of "use it or lose it" is a stale, invalid argument and a political distraction to rising gasoline prices combined with the fact that we're not doing enough in the Gulf to use our own resources and put Americans back to work. Let's get back on track with some facts:

The administration itself is preventing the industry from developing these leases because it is not issuing permits to drill or conduct seismic studies of these leases. They want the industry to develop the leases it already possesses, but they won't grant the permits to do so.

Companies pay millions of dollars to acquire these leases (each lease costs at least $250,000 and some have gone for more than $100,000,000), further fees for renting the leases and the leases have a finite term. If a company does not produce oil or gas from a lease then they are required to return it to the government. In other words "use it or lose it" is already the law.

These are very successful and sophisticated companies that are engaged in this business and it makes no logical sense for companies to pay millions of dollars to purchase leases, sit on them for 10 years, and then give them back to the government. They make money by supplying the American economy with the energy it needs to grow, not from sitting on assets. The level of capital expenditures by the industry to develop these leases demonstrates their commitment to find oil and gas. For example, the industry spent more than $37 billion (with a B) in capital expenditures to develop deep water Gulf leases issued between 1996 and 2000. In addition they paid more than $4 billion (with a B) in bonus bids to obtain those leases in the first place. With that level of investment, it is hard to argue that the industry is not working hard to develop the leases it owns.

Finally, these arguments simply ignore the basics of the oil and natural gas industry. Companies purchase leases for the right to explore for the resources. You don't know if a lease actually contains oil or natural gas until you move forward and drill an exploratory well. Companies purchase a large portfolio of leases to give them the greatest opportunity to find oil and natural gas. They work hard to survey and study all of their leases with the hope that they can narrow the list down to a subset that have the best likelihood of actually containing oil or natural gas. However, it is not uncommon for a company to spend $100 million to drill a well and find no oil or natural gas. In fact, companies drill more wells that have no oil or natural gas than wells that actually do.

With one election just concluded, the positioning for the next one has started, but it's time to stop the stupid and start getting smart on creating jobs, growing our economy and increasing our energy security.

Updated on March 31, 2011: Read my latest post on the nation's energy policy: Administration Misses Energy Reality

Comments

Related

Blog Posts

Made in America: Increase Access for Secure Energy Futu...

American-made energy. With the Energy Information Administration projecting that the United States will need more than 16 percent a...

Blog Posts

In an Election Year, Time to Talk Energy

Just a thought, but how great would it be if one of this fall’s presidential debates focused solely on energy issues? Past presid...

Blog Posts

Unused Leases? You’ve Got to be Joking!

The warmed-over claim that oil and natural gas companies aren’t using large numbers of leases on public lands is like a Mark Twain...

Blog Posts

Watch Live: Energy in an Election Year

.blog #main .post-body .video-wrapper { width:500px; height:418px; padding:0; overflow:visible; margin:0 auto 18px; } ....

Blog Posts

Hansen’s Oil Sands Facts are Lost in Space

To hear it from environmental activist James Hansen, development of the oil sands in Canada will usher in the apocalypse, “game ove...

Blog Posts

Job Creation To-Do List? Here’s Ours

Here’s the president talking about job creation Tuesday in Albany, N.Y.: “Now, we know the true engine of job creation in this...

Blog Posts

To the President’s Ear: Build the Keystone XL

In an interview with Fox Business Channel this week, billionaire Warren Buffett voiced support for construction of the Keystone XL...

Blog Posts

The Demand for Energy and Steel

There’s a good story going on in Lorain, Ohio, a steel town that has seen ups and downs. Thanks to the surge in production of energ...

Blog Posts

Facts, Not Excuses, Should Guide Decision on Re-Routed...

It’s good to hear that TransCanada has submitted its new application for a presidential permit to build the Keystone XL pipeline. T...

Blog Posts

All For Efficiency

A recent post on the White House Blog updates the administration’s effort to see federal agencies make at least $2 billion in energ...

Blog Posts

Washington Post: Keystone XL Rejection Has ‘Little Ra...

More on the Keystone XL pipeline. The Washington Post editorializes: “President Obama’s refusal so far to authorize Keystone X...

Blog Posts

Ohio Summit: Talking Energy, Jobs

Editor’s note, 5/3: The event has concluded; see below for the archived videos. There’s not a better venue for a high-level discu...

Blog Posts

Keystone XL: Put Workers to Work, Mr. President

Key points made by the president during Monday’s speech at a conference of the AFL-CIO’s Building and Construction Trades Departmen...

Blog Posts

Hey, Jay Carney, You Forgot Something!

POLITICO Pro Energy reports that while talking to reporters about crucifixion comments by EPA’s Region 6 administrator, White House...

Blog Posts

‘If I Wanted America to Fail …’

Here’s an abbreviated version of a video by Free Market America on administration policies that the group says are undermining dome...

Stay Connected